January 27, 2015
Mark Christian is an ex-Muslim who pulls no punches when speaking out about his former religion.
After leaving Islam a decade ago to convert to Christianity, Mark continually calls out the Muslims who murder in the name of their misguided faith. He’s also very vocal when it comes to dismantling the rhetoric of those on the left, who continually criticize anyone who opposes Islam as having a case of Islamophobia.
When Mark learned that the Mayor of Paris is now planning to sue Fox News after their coverage of “no go zones” and that those on the left were joining in with the harsh criticism of the news station, he had a few things to say. Even though specific areas in Europe have not been officially named “no go zones,” the fact remains that Muslim-controlled areas do exist, and the violence towards non-Muslims in these areas makes entering virtually impossible.
Here is Mark’s message:
The recent argument over the existence of “no-go” zones in France and Britain is perhaps the most teachable moment to come around in a long while regarding the spread of Islamic supremacism. Here are the bones – we’ll add the meat to the skeleton as we go along.
First, let’s look at the facts. Islam is spreading rapidly throughout Western Europe through Muslim immigration and high birthrates. Of all the Western European countries, France has the highest percentage of Muslims, at around 10% of their total population.
Britain and Sweden are on similar paths to France, with their Muslim populations largely refusing assimilation into the larger culture and political systems of their adopted homes. This resistance continues through second and even third generations, making for an increasingly alienated population, albeit one with all the rights and privileges of the greater society from which they choose to stand apart.
It is this tendency (caused by Islam) that results in something more than just neighborhoods where people feel unsafe, and having your pizza delivered is impossible. The result is areas where police never go, because police are never called. Crime in these areas are dealt with by the neighborhood itself, but not under the rubric of French, British or Swedish law; but rather under Sharia Law.
As the populations in these areas grow, non-Muslims are routinely harassed and driven out. Their properties, no longer worth anything, are then bought for a song by the Muslim immigrants.
Does this fact alone mean that it is a “no-go” area? Not necessarily, but one additional fact not in dispute adds a layer of authenticity to the claim. Rioting (or the threat to do so) is a staple of the Muslim community’s negotiating platform. The host nation walks on eggshells for fear of sparking massive destruction and violence necessitating the intervention of the police, who promptly find themselves engaged in something akin to a pitched battle. The struggle over city sections ensues with the end result being some form of negotiated peace.
Of course, that’s how all neighborhood disputes are settled in liberal representative democracies, right? Call these self-administered ghettos what you will, the fact remains that they are by no means under the “control” of the host nation any longer.
Another fact not in dispute is that the animosity between Muslim residents and their host nations in Western Europe, is leading to a double-standard in both law enforcement and adjudication in these countries.
In England, a Muslim “grooming gang” kidnapped, drugged and otherwise forced underage British girls into prostitution over a period of 16 years. The funny thing is, the police were aware of it, the local Council was aware of it, the social services administration was aware of it, and because they feared being branded and prosecuted as racists, they turned a blind eye.
More at Mad World News: