Do Females Belong in Combat Arms? Latest Army “Experiment” Suggests, NO.

(Screenshot credit, Mad World News)

(Screenshot credit, Mad World News)

May 13, 2015

Mad World News: by Shae Weatherall

Opinions vary widely on whether military women belong in direct combat positions while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces. The most touted justification for allowing females in combat is simply because they want to. The majority reason is purely anatomical and physiological for those who do not support combat Military Occupation Specialties (MOS’s) to be open to women.

Many critics of allowing women in a combat MOS claim that women can’t physically perform the same rigorous tasks as their male counterparts, nor do their normal bodily functions allow for them to be without proper hygiene facilities for potential months at a time while in combat situations.


Earlier this year, the United States Army allowed 138 women to attempt to qualify for the first ever gender-integrated Ranger School. Initially, all females were required to attend one of four separate qualifying Ranger Training Assessment Courses (RTAC), during which they would learn valuable skills that they may not have previously had the opportunity to acquire in preparation for the actual Ranger School which began in late April.

According to The Washington Times, only 19 females were pushed through to the next level of qualification, the Ranger Assessment Phase (RAP), which further evaluates Ranger School participants.

Just 8 of those 19 women were able to get through RAP week and continue with the Army Ranger School’s intensely rigorous, three-phase, two-month-long course.

The Army Times reported on Friday that of the 8 female soldiers who began the first phase of the physically and mentally punishing Ranger School’s combat leadership course at Fort Benning, Georgia, known as the Darby Phase, none were able to complete it.

Roughly fifty-percent of the original male soldiers and none of the female soldiers will go on to the second phase, in their quest for the coveted Army Ranger tab.

Fox News reports that all 8 women and 101 males that failed out of the Darby phase at least did well enough that they are being “recycled,” meaning they have the opportunity to try the Darby phase again, beginning on May 14th at Fort Benning.

At this time, the standards for female soldiers participating in the Army Ranger School have not been lowered in comparison to the standards expected of the male participants, nor do I believe that the women who are actually involved desire that to happen. Typically, it’s the feminist special interest groups who have no tangible investment that try to push their own agenda with those sorts of demands.

According to Maj. Gen. Scott Miller, commanding general of the Maneuver Center of Excellence, Fort Benning, he expects the same standards to be met, regardless of gender.

“I want to make it really clear. If they do not meet the prerequisites at the RTAC, I’m not recommending them to move forward to the Ranger course,” Miller said. “We’re trying to set the soldiers up for the best possible chance of success as we go forward. This is soldiers being afforded the opportunities commensurate with their abilities.”

Although I agree wholeheartedly that Ranger School standards should never be adjusted for women, I give much respect to the female soldiers who have attempted to earn their Ranger tab in going through this grueling school. I look forward to hearing how the remaining 8 women fare in their next go at the Darby phase beginning later this week.

More at Mad World News

Disclaimer: This was not written by Lorra B.

7 thoughts on “Do Females Belong in Combat Arms? Latest Army “Experiment” Suggests, NO.

  1. Two thoughts….one sexist….one not. First…I’m old fashioned when it comes to women and don’t believe they belong in combat. Not because they CAN’T do it…I believe they probably can. But because they SHOULDN’T do it. That’s the sexist one. Secondly, I feel that if a woman is qualified, and can perform the duties, she’s qualified and if that’s what she wants to do, she should do it (that’s the intellectual part of me talking). So, let’s just suffice to say, I’m not going to be messing with ANY of the 8 ladies that got as far as they did in the Ranger Training. And no, Lorra B. I’m not messing with you either!

    Liked by 1 person

    • BAHAHAHAHA! I’m not THAT tough actually DesertMan! LOLOL! I happen to agree with you sir! So, I guess that makes me sexist as well. I truly believe that women CAN do it but for the life of ME, I don’t know why they would want to. (I have some reasons, but I will keep them to myself at the moment, LOL) .But, that is their choice it seems…

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s