Obama Caught Calling Mexicans “Gang-Bangers” as Media Blasts Donald Trump

(Screenshot credit, DC Clothesline)

(Screenshot credit, DC Clothesline)

July 10, 2015

DC Clothesline: H/T Sheeple No More

It is amazing how all these attacks are piling from the left against Donald Trump for simply exposing the rape epidemic on the Mexican border while no attacks were made against President Obama who during a town hall style event in Nashville, to discuss Obamacare, President Obama referred to some illegal immigrants as “gang-bangers,” adding they should be deported.

Then we have CNN which tries to refute what is obviously a major problem on the Mexican borders, the raping of women. CNN host Don Lemon interviewed Donald Trump a few minutes ago and they aired a portion of the interview where Trump defended his comments that rapists were coming from Mexico.

Don tries to suggest that the articles Trump is referring in his defense only talk about illegal women being raped (I guess this should not matter to CNN) and not that rapists and criminals are coming across the border. But Trump responds ‘Somebody’s doing the raping, Don…how can you say such a thing!?’


How the whole liberal world is attacking Trump is disgusting and it is usually folks who could care less about the evils that happen, they in turn, turn a blind eye, to what is happening, and do anything to slander the messenger instead of dealing with the issues at hand.

Yet during a town hall style event in Nashville to discuss Obamacare, President Obama referred to some illegal immigrants as “gang-bangers,” adding they should be deported.

So is it okay to call Mexicans “gang-bangers” and it is not okay to expose the rape epidemic?

Obama made his remarks after he was asked if he would expand Obamacare benefits to illegal immigrants.

“We should not be encouraging illegal immigration,” he remarked to the group. “What we should be doing is setting up a smart legal immigration system that doesn’t separate families but does focus on making sure that people who are dangerous, people who are, you know, gang-bangers, who are criminals that we’re deporting as quickly as possible.”

Obama boasted that “we’ve made improvements on all those fronts,” but blamed House Republicans for failing to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

During his conversation, he pointed out that some illegal immigrants are contributing to society and families need a pathway to legalization.

He referred to his executive actions on immigration reform as one way he was handling the issue in the meantime while he’s waiting for Congress to act.

“I suspect this will be a topic of conversation during the upcoming presidential campaign,” he said.

I say screw Obama and VIVA DONALD TRUMP!


Walid Shoebat is a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood who was converted to Christianity, and author of the book, God’s War on Terror.

Courtesy of Freedom Outpost.

Don’t forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Disclaimer: This article was not written by Lorra B.

As Confederate Flag Anger Grows, Obama Makes MAJOR Terrorism Policy Change

dJune 24, 2015

Mad World Newsby Sean Brown

The debate over the Confederate flag has boiled over into a nationwide topic as people demand its removal from everything in the public square. Never letting a good crisis go to waste, Barack Obama quietly announced a major change to our terrorism policy, and it has a lot of people scared that it will endanger Americans both here and abroad.

According to CNN, the United States has long held the position that our nation doesn’t negotiate with terrorists under any circumstances whatsoever, as doing so only empowers them and makes them more likely to commit horrible acts in the future. Unfortunately, that’s all about to change, thanks to our spineless president.

When James Foley was abducted by ISIS, his family was very vocal about the lack of effective action in freeing their son. In fact, his mother, Diane, said she was “embarrassed and appalled” by our government and its inability to rescue James.

It was the Foley family and 82 others who ultimately paved the way for the new shift, which will ease the restrictions on both families and government when it comes to striking a deal with hostages.

According to CNN:

The White House will release on Wednesday a presidential directive and an executive order that will allow the government to communicate and negotiate with terrorist groups holding Americans hostage, a source briefed on the matter told CNN.

While the government will maintain its policy of not making “substantive concessions” to captors or paying ransoms, the White House will announce that officials will no longer threaten with criminal prosecution the families of American hostages who do pay ransoms to their relatives’ captors, according to a senior administration official.

You terrified yet? I am, and you should be. There’s a reason we’ve never negotiated with terrorists, and allowing it will only empower them to become bolder when it comes to taking hostages. In fact, it’s estimated that the majority of the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group’s revenue comes from collecting ransom for abductees, despite the long held position we won’t negotiate, so what do you think this will lead to?

My fears aren’t unsubstantiated, either. House Speaker John Boehner (R- Ohio) said that he has similar concerns and feels the change in our 200-year-old policy will only further endanger Americans here and abroad.

“I’ve not seen the report nor have I seen an analysis of it, but we have had a policy in the United States for over 200 years of not paying ransom and not negotiating with terrorists and the concern that I have is that by lifting that long held principle you could be endangering more Americans here and overseas,” Boehner said.

So it appears as if Obama, who knew for some time now this change was going to happen, used the cover of controversy to once again pull the wool over our eyes as he empowered our enemies. Is it anything new? No, not in the least. But this is a major change, and it’s undoubtedly one that will put more lives at risk.

Individually, his actions can be explained away as either incompetence or poor decision-making. However, taken as a whole, I’m really beginning to think he’s trying to take our nation down from within, which would make sense, given the past of his chief adviser, Valerie Jarrett.

[H/T: IJReview]

More at Mad World News

Disclaimer: This article was not written by Lorra B.

CNN Live Shot Interrupted By Heckler: ‘White People Are Terrorists,’ ‘Obama Is An Uncle Tom!’ [VIDEO]

June 19, 2015

The Daily Caller:

A CNN live shot in Charleston, S.C. was disrupted Thursday hours after police arrested Dylann Storm Roof for the brutal killing of nine people at a predominantly African-American church.

What do you think?

During a hit by CNN’s John Berman on the scene in Charleston, a woman suddenly appeared and started shouting at the host, repeatedly asking the host if he was “angry.”

What do you think?

“There’s a lot of heartbreak to go around in this city today,” Berman started off.

What do you think?

“‘No, we’re mad, we’re angry,” the woman started shouting at Berman. “Tell the truth.”

“White people are terrorists,” the woman said as Berman tried to report on the scene, saying that traffic was picking up for the first time near the site of the shooting

Her heckling of Berman subsided for a few moments, but ramped right back up again when Don Lemon appeared with Berman to talk about the tragedy.

What do you think?

“I’m joined now by Don Lemon who’s with me,” Berman said bringing Lemon into the fold.

What do you think?

“And a friend,” Lemon said with a chuckle.

The woman slowly made her way into the background between the two anchors and ultimately shouted a variant of “are you angry, Don?” at the host ten times. Lemon and Berman seemed to keep their cool, though they gave the woman a look once or twice

“Terrorists! The president’s a puppet!” she added in her commentary. “Stop the lies.”

“Stop the lies. He’s an Uncle Tom too. President Obama’s an Uncle Tom too,” the woman said without skipping a beat. “Black folks, get off your knees and start praying.”

More at The Daily Caller

Disclaimer: This article was not written by Lorra B.

No, Hillary, You Just Can’t Fake It Anymore

dJune 16, 2015

by Lorra B.

Bob Woodward, a veteran The Washington Post journalist, got it right when he stated Hillary Clinton “Can’t fake” her way into the presidency.

On CNN’s State of the Union Woodward stated, “If you distill what people are looking for now in a president, it is somebody who can govern, somebody who thinks about them. And Hillary Clinton made a credible case on that. But they want somebody who’s a truth teller and she’s got some distance to cover on that.”

Well, that would, perhaps, be an understatement. In order for her to begin telling ‘truth’ she will have to make ‘Hard Choices,’ actually speak with the media and answer Hard Questions.

Woodward went on to say, “I did books that involved her. One of her political mottos, personal mottos, was ‘fake it until you make it,’ and that’s clever and that means ‘I’m going to tough it out.’ But you can’t fake your way into the presidency. So, she’s got to convince people, ‘I’m really going to tell you the truth.’”

Just what will that look like, Hillary? Well, will the truth start with Benghazi? We have just learned that dozens of emails given to congress were not part of the originally submitted emails to the State Department concerning the Benghazi attacks. Hmmmm. That is upwards of 60 additional emails that people will want to know about Hillary.

We also know that “Though her lawyer David Kendall told the House Select Benghazi Committee that Clinton’s “hrod17@clintonemail.com” email address “was not an address that existed during Secretary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State,” new emails obtained by the New York Times show that Clinton did indeed use that email address for official business,” according to BreitBart. Will the truth start with Bengauzi? Or, perhaps, the truth will begin with The Clinton Foundation?

The Clinton Foundation, if you somehow haven’t heard, is under unbelievable scrutiny, and it should be.

Bill Clinton’s foundation set up a fundraising arm in Sweden that collected $26 million in donations at the same time that country was lobbying Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department to forgo sanctions that threatened its thriving business with Iran, according to interviews and documents obtained by The Washington Times,”

Furthermore, it seems the Swedish arm of the foundation had never been cleared by the State Ethics Comity nor was it ever disclosed, “even though one of its largest sources of donations was a ‘Swedish government-sanctioned lottery.’

The Clinton Foundation has taken contributions from varying governments, such as the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait and has even taken money from the Saudi Arabian government.

Clearly this is just one small example of The Clinton Foundation woes. But, as of yet, Hillary remains silent about those funds and huge ‘gifts’. I place the word ‘gifts’ in quotes because we all know that foreign governments are not allowed to ‘gift’ political campaigns.

She also has made no comment on whether she was inappropriately influenced by said contributions. Is this where Hillary starts coming clean?

Well, Hillary, as a presidential candidate you can’t hide from the press forever and you WILL have to speak of all the compromising situations you’ve found yourself in. The question is, however, will the truth be told and will it be told convincingly?

Yes, Mr. Woodward, you did get this right. Hillary simply ‘can’t fake’ it any longer.

Watch as Former President Bill Clinton discusses the funding controversy surrounding his foundation. June 10, 2015

By Lorra B.

Hillary Wants This Slogan & Photo BANNED, So We Should Probably Share It

dJune 13, 2015

Mad World News: by Meaghan Ellis

Hillary Clinton definitely isn’t pleased with a questionable photo that’s floating around social media sites. With her eye on the White House, this incriminating photo doesn’t help her campaign because it raises so many questions about what actually happens behind closed doors. It’s probably safe to say this is the worse photo she’s ever taken.

The shocking photo, which was originally uploaded via Clash Daily, captures an extremely disheveled Hillary that looks as if she’s been run through a car wash. It’s unclear whether the photo has been photoshopped, but one thing’s for sure — it’s ignited a media firestorm. Shortly after the photo was posted, the comments came flooding in.

Hillary Clinton photo shared via Clash Daily

Hillary Clinton photo shared via Clash Daily

The shocking photo has been featured on several different conservative sites. It also fueled the fire for hundreds of Instagram memes. Needless to say, Hillary’s been the butt of many jokes via Instagram, because the photo has opened the door for a colossal bashing session.


Surprisingly, it looks like Hilary is planning to combat all the offensive memes posted with the new “signature photo.” According to CNN, the Democratic politician has officially joined Instagram in an effort to reach the masses via social media.

On June 10, she posted her first photo of three shirts as an expression of patriotism. The three items are all part of Hillary’s signature pantsuit ensemble. So far Hillary only has 100,000 followers, but the preliminary poll offers surprising results.

Here’s Hillary’s first post:

Hillary Clinton Wants This Photo BANNED, So We Should Probably Share It

A recent Harvard University Institute of Politics poll shows that 83 percent of Facebook users are 18 to 29-year-old. A total of 44 percent in that age group are on Instagram, and only 39 percent are on Twitter. The poll also shows that 55 percent of all young adults in that same age group “would rather see a Democrat in the White House in 2016.”

However, traditional Republicans appear to show more voting consistencies for midterm voting. With 300 million viewers sharing more than 70 million photos and videos on a daily basis, Instagram will reportedly make the 2016 election one of the “most visual elections to date.” So, visual aspects can definitely help or hurt Hillary’s campaign. Only time will tell how it all pans out.

More at Mad World News

[Image via Gallery Hip]

Disclaimer: this article was not written by Lorra B.

Hillary Clinton Will Give Speech But Won’t Take Any Questions

dJune 3, 2015

American Glob: Of course…


Why would Hillary Clinton answer questions? Those are for the little people.

Watch her adviser Joel Benenson go silent when asked about an interview on CNN…

The Hill makes a good point here…

Hillary Clinton’s honesty problem

Is it possible to win the White House if more than half the electorate thinks you’re dishonest?

Hillary Clinton may yet put that question to the test. It’s not the kind of challenge any candidate would relish, but two new polls released on Tuesday underlined the presidential hopeful’s difficulty in persuading the public of her integrity.

Both those polls found Clinton deep underwater when voters were asked whether they viewed her as honest and trustworthy.

Transparency isn’t her strongest point.

More at American Glob:

Disclaimer, This article was not written by Lorra B.

U.S. Military Wants China To Know They Are Losing Patience

dMay 29, 2015

CNN: By Jim Sciutto

CNN’s Jim Sciutto recently got exclusive access to a U.S. Navy surveillance plane on a secret mission near China, where they flew over a string of man-made islands. China’s Navy issued eight warnings to the plane and told it to leave the area. On Tuesday, Jim answered questions from the Reddit community during anAsk me anythingsession. Below are highlights from the conversation.

1. If your flight was warned eight times, I guess the flight crew didn’t take it very seriously then?

The flight crew was prepared — and read a scripted response saying that the U.S. considers the airspace there international. Frankly, both sides were very professional and calm, although I did hear frustration in the voice of one of the Chinese Navy radio operators when he yelled, “You go now!”

This was not the first U.S. flight over the islands but it is the first one the U.S. advertised broadly by bringing a TV crew on board. That was intentional and, judging by the Chinese government reaction, seems to have accomplished its goal of sending a message.

2. Did the crew show any change in posture/emotion when the warnings were received?

Frankly, it did not. They have flown these flights before and been challenged by the Chinese Navy before. A few months ago, it was a different story when a Chinese fighter did a barrel roll in front of a U.S. surveillance flight much closer to the Chinese coast. The U.S. formally complained to China and — I’m told — China promised it wouldn’t happen again.

CNN exclusive: China warns U.S. surveillance plane

3. How capable is China of shooting down the aircraft, even if flying at around 15,000 feet? Do eight warnings seem a bit redundant in their case?

Good question: for now, the flights are too far from to Chinese coast to be in range of Chinese fighter aircraft. Chinese naval ships are nearby though — we saw them! — and could have the weapons on board to threaten a U.S. aircraft but at this point, firing at a U.S. plane would be a clear act of war and therefore extremely unlikely.

4. If you were on a spy plane … why announce it to the world?

Again, fair question: clearly, in this case, the U.S. military wanted the world to know. Fact is, by bringing a CNN crew on board, the military wanted not only to show the world the extent of China’s activity but also show China that the U.S. is watching and, frankly, losing patience. In terms of sending a message, that tactic seems to have worked.

5. How does this type of access affect your reporting? Is bias not a concern with the networks anymore?

This is a very fair question. It’s my personal view that embedding during the second Iraq war often served the military’s interests. When you’re with troops — and your life, frankly, depends on them — it takes a real effort to separate your own point of view from theirs. I faced that challenge myself and hope I found a way to do it. I had the same concern going up in the surveillance flight. All you can do is ask hard questions and attempt to tell both sides of the story as best you can. But we all have to be very vigilant.

6. Do you think that these actions could deteriorate to an armed conflict over these islands?

Though neither side wants it, it is possible. And it most likely wouldn’t happen by choice. Rather, the worry is that a Chinese plane comes too close to an American plane or a Chinese ship too close to a U.S. ship. Do they bump? Does one go down? Fact is, this has happened before. In 2001, a Chinese fighter bumped a U.S. EP-3 surveillance plane. The Chinese fighter went down, the EP-3 did an emergency and dangerous landing on a Chinese island and were held for several days. The same encounter today, with China’s military much stronger, would be extremely dangerous.

More at CNN

Disclaimer: This article was not written by Silent Soldier.

U.S. Military Inadvertently Ship Live Anthrax Across The Globe



May 28, 2015

By Lorra B. for Silent Soldier

In a potentially devastating blunder, Wednesday the Pentagon announced that ‘live Anthrax’ was shipped from a Utah lab to approximately nine different states over the last year.

It was a lab based in Maryland that sounded the alert that live samples had been received. The U.S. Military unintentionally FedExed the live Anthrax samples to four U.S. lab workers and as many as 22 overseas labs. All have been placed in post exposure treatment and been prescribed prophylaxis as a precaution.

A South Korean base was also indicated to have inadvertently received a live sample, one that was to have been used in an “Anthrax detection exercise,” according to Fox News.

Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesperson, was confident that “there is no known risk to the general public, and there are no suspected or confirmed cases of anthrax infection in potentially exposed lab workers.”

Because the Anthrax samples were thought to be dead they did not have to be shipped under tight protocols. A defense official stated, “These were supposed to be dead spores Anthrax, called AG-1.”

But there are conflicting stories as to when and where the samples where shipped though a FedEx spokesperson, Jim McCluskey, would not confirm the report saying “FedEx is committed to the safe transport of all customer shipments, and our priority is the safety of our employees. We will be working closely with the Department of Defense and the Centers for Disease Control to gather information about these shipments.”

When the defense official was asked how many of the states receiving the Anthrax actually received Live Anthrax, the official stated, “out of an abundance of caution, it is safe to assume it’s all live.”

“Five active duty Air Force members, 10 active duty Army members, three civilian officials and four contractors are now getting preventative treatment in South Korea,” according to CNN.

There is an ongoing investigation and all samples are being collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

By Lorra B. for Silent Soldier

UPDATE! Official: Bodies Found With Wreckage Of Missing U.S. Helicopter In Nepal

Nepali military service members unload supplies from a UH-1Y Huey in Charikot, Nepal, on May 5. Screenshot Credit, CNN

Nepali military service members unload supplies from a UH-1Y Huey in Charikot, Nepal, on May 5. Screenshot Credit, CNN

May 15, 2015

CNN: By Sugam Pokharel

Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN)The wreckage of a U.S. Marine helicopter that went missing with six U.S. Marines and two Nepali service members on board has been found, U.S. Defense officials confirmed Friday.

“It is unlikely there are any survivors at this time,” said U.S. Marine Lt. Gen. John Wissler, commanding general on the ground in Nepal, and said he was unable to confirm the report from the Nepalese government, that three bodies had been discovered.

Three bodies were discovered in the burned wreckage of the helicopter, which was delivering aid to earthquake survivors, Nepalese Defense Secretary Ishwori Paudyal said.

Wissler said that due to the harsh conditions of the region, he was calling off the search for the evening. Wissler said the deaths would not affect the U.S. Marine mission to the Nepalese region to assist with aid following a series of deadly earthquakes.

The American chopper was spotted in the Gorthali area, at an altitude of 11,200 feet (3,400 meters), said Nepalese Brig. Gen. Binoj Basnet. Its discovery follows intensive searches from the air and on foot, amid treacherous terrain.

The U.S. Joint Task Force confirmed the wreckage, 8 miles north of Charikot, was that of the missing UH-1Y Huey helicopter. It has not yet commented on the reported discovery of bodies.

Four pararescuemen and one combat rescue officer were on the ground, the Joint Task Force statement said. “The assessment of the site is ongoing and a thorough investigation will be conducted,” it said.

More at  CNN

Disclaimer: This article was not written by Lorra B.

ISIS Promises ‘Harsher’ Attacks On American Soil

The group said that “The next six months will be interesting.”

The group said that “The next six months will be interesting.”

May 15, 2015

tomfernandez28’s Blog: BY RANDY DESOTO

ISIS promises that last week’s attack in Texas is only the beginning of its plans to reign terror on the people of the United States.

The Islamic State made the announcement on its official radio station as reported by CNN: “We say to the defenders of the cross, the U.S., that future attacks are going to be harsher and worse. The Islamic State soldiers will inflict harm on you with the grace of God. The future is just around the corner.”

According to Agence France Presse, the jihadi group further stated during its announcement:

Two of the soldiers of the caliphate executed an attack on an art exhibit in Garland, Texas, and this exhibit was portraying negative pictures of the Prophet Mohammad … We tell America that what is coming will be even bigger and more bitter, and that you will see the soldiers of ISIS do terrible things.

Someone tweeting under the name of a British ISIS jihadist who is suspected of hacking the U.S. Central Command computers in January sent this message following the Texas attack:

Screen Shot 2015-05-15 at 10.52.56 AM

As reported by Western Journalism, ISIS proclaimed that it “71 trained soldiers in 15 different states” in the U.S. “ready at our word to attack any target we desire.” The group specifically mentioned five targeted states including Virginia, Maryland, Illinois, California, and Michigan, and promised that “The next six months will be interesting.”

Screen Shot 2015-05-15 at 10.54.00 AM

According to Judicial Watch, ISIS also reportedly has training camps in Mexican border communities near El Paso, with plans to infiltrate the United States through Texas and New Mexico.

Walid Shoebat, a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood who has since converted to Christianity, wrote regarding the Islamic State’s most recent threat: “When ISIS references to the ‘nation of the Cross,’ what they mean is their intent to kill Christians.”

ISIS has specifically called for the death of Pamela Geller, but she will not back down. Geller was one of the organizers of the “Draw the Prophet” Muhammad cartoon competition, which ISIS sympathizers Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi targeted last week. In a statement posted online, ISIS said: “Our aim was the khanzeer [swine] Pamela Geller and to show her that we don’t care what land she hides in or what sky shields her; we will send all our Lions to achieve her slaughter.”

CBS News reports that Geller, who lives in New York, met with investigators from the city police department’s counterterrorism and intelligence bureaus last week. “NYPD spokesman Stephen Davis said they will do a ‘comprehensive threat assessment’ to determine whether Geller will need security, but did not comment on details of the threat or security measures.”

Geller is head of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, which seeks to educate Americans about the threat posed by Islam. The group has run ads all over the country and sponsored the cartoon contest.

The winner of the $10,000 prize drew an angry Muhammad bearing a sword and yelling, “You can’t draw me!”

More at tomfernandez28’s Blog

Disclaimer: This article was not written by Lorra B.